Case briefs Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Case briefs - Assignment utilizationThe case went through the mash of first trial all the way to the Supreme tribunal. At the coquet of first trial, a suppression motion was granted to the defendant. This is because the court found out that the search example that had been issued earlier was not based on a feasible cause. To be specific, the court contended that that search confirm was surrounded by contentions of an untested informer and inadequate validation by the law of nature. Upon the subsequent trial to the Court of Appeal, the court affirmed the decision of the court of first trial. The Court of Appeal declined the exclusionary linguistic rule that was put send of good faith. Lastly, when the case reached the Supreme Court of the U.S, certiorari was granted.The legal issue that was in this case was whether the exclusionary rule to the fourth amendment should be amended so as to permit the usage of evidence acquired by practice of law officers acting in judicious dep endence on a search example dispensed by an isolated and impartial magistrate but eventually established to be uncorroborated by credible cause.The court held that the exclusionary rule ought to be amended so as allow the use of evidence acquired in the excusable belief of acting under good faith that a given search warrant conformed to the give tongue to fourth amendment.Justice White stated that the exclusionary rule to the fourth amendment ought to be amended so as to allow the use of evidence acquired in the justifiable belief of good faith that an issued search warrant complied with the provisions of the fourth amendment. He argued that the exclusionary rule was a judicial-made remedy and not a constitutional right. He said that the rules main objective is to deter the misconducts that may be occasioned by the police officers. He further contended that it foot be amended if the police officers have tangible evidence that can be used if it can be shown that the