A Critical Analysis of the Husbands' Authoritarian Perception About Research Paper

A Critical Analysis of the Husbands Authoritarian Perception to the highest degree Their Wives as Babies Incapable of Walking the Path of Life - Research Paper ExampleThese authors attempt to tell that the social institutions of marriage and family are structured in such a time-honored manner that these institutions themselves advocates for the economises transcendence perpetuating the inferiority and subservience of the wives. In such patriarchy-shaped institution, even the most passionate relationship allows little scopes for the women to bewilder their say, since potent-lust and carnal hungers remain disguised under the facades of get by and passion. Both Gilman and Chopins are loved, and thus toyed as a petulant baby that is capable of nothing, but of creating childish nuisance for their husbands. Both Desirees and the protagonist of Gilmans story husbands appear to be authoritarian patriarchal figures that strictly exert their restricting authority over their wives. T he slight difference between Armands (Desirees husband) and bunss (Janes husband) authorities is that whereas Johns sincere restriction imposed upon Jane pushes her towards horrible psychological transformation, Armand abandons Desiree considering her as a sex-machine that has failed to produce his desired result. Like most other feminists in the 19th Century Gilman attempts to dig up the root of patriarchy built in the familiar structure of the social institution of family. Indeed Gilman has challenged this patriarchal attitude towards women as a child with psychological deficits. Thrailkill Fagan Jane notes that Gilmans story originates in her take in discover as he says, the real purpose of the story was to reach Dr. S. Weir Mitchell Gilmans husband, and convince him of the error of his ship canal (47). In the very first place she has put the traditional husband-wife relationship in the conventional marital institution, into question, which is commonly acknowledged as healthy and hailed as the safest place for women after their marriage. In the story, Gilman propounds that a cause of superiority complex of the patriarchal authority of the male dominated society lies in there infra this apparently universal aspect of a husbands love or care for his wife. Scrutinizing Johns (a proper noun denoting commonly the male counterpart of a marital bond) caring activities from a muliebritys perspective, she rather vindicates that women like Jane are not active and equal participants in the love-game with their husbands like John. In most cases, women are no match for their male counterparts in this husband-wife love game. Rather they are considered as the most delicate, the weakest, the most fragile and incapable of walking through the path of life on their own therefore like a baby, they are to be tended delicately, to be cosseted and pampered by their husbands. Gilman further shows that such love and care of a husband, indeed, linger a womans inferiority in h er household by delaying her maturity. In cases it deteriorates a womans psychological condition often pushing her to the verge of insanity. save in the Desirees Baby Chopin has approached towards the traditional concept of love and passion between a husband and a wife from a different angle. For her, the terms love and passion are ultimately the productions, of patriarchy, which are intended to keep the male-lust and male-desire under the mask of euphemism. In the traditional husband-wife relationship, love is ultimately means of male exploitation. (Wolff 45-46) But this love, the mask of male-lust, gets dissolved when confronted with major choices of life. First Armand